ABSTRACT
【Objective】 To observe the regulation of autonomic nerves in blood donors during blood donation by heart rate variability analysis and explore the possible mechanism of donation related vasovagal reaction. 【Methods】 Electrocardiogram (ECG) of 90 blood donors was monitored by Fontaine Ⅰlead during the whole process of blood donation, and the 5-min heart rate variation before, during and after blood donation was analyzed. 【Results】 During the whole process of blood donation, the sympathetic HRV index (LF nu) and the sympathetic and vagal balance ability index (LF/HF) increased, whereas the vagal nerve index (pNN50, RMSSD, HFnu) and heart rate variability index (SDNN, Total power) decreased. For baseline heart rate variability of different blood donors (first-time vs. repeated, male vs. female, 18-24 years old vs. ≥25 years old, <400 mL vs. 400 mL) before blood donation, the pNN50, RMSSD and Total power of 18-24 years old blood donors were higher, but other indicators showed no significant difference. There were differences in HRV indexes of different types of blood donors during blood donation compared with before blood donation. The decrease of pNN50 and HFnu and the increase of LF/HF were larger in experienced blood donors than in first-time blood donors. The decrease of RMSSD was larger in male blood donors than in female blood donors; the change of LF/HF was larger in blood donors aged≥25 years than in blood donors aged 18-24 years; other indicators had no significant difference. 【Conclusion】 Blood donation leads to reflex readjustment of the cardiac autonomic tone: the sympathetic nerve is excited while the vagal nerve is suppressed. The cardiac autonomic nerve function of first-time blood donors, female donors and low-age (18-24 years old) donors to blood donation stress is not fully regulated. Donation related vasovagal reaction may be related to the autonomic nerve regulation function of blood donors.
ABSTRACT
Introducción: en la provincia de Matanzas, de enero del 2003 a diciembre de 2011, se desarrolló un programa de hemovigilancia para incrementar la seguridad de la cadena transfusional. Objetivo: analizar los efectos de este programa sobre las reacciones adversas en los donantes de sangre. Métodos: Se identificó el estado de la notificación de los eventos adversos de la donación en el año 2002, etapa previa al programa. Se mejoró el servicio de donaciones con la revisión de los procederes y las buenas prácticas; a la metodología para la selección del donante se incorporaron los datos geográficos epidemiológicos de cada territorio. A partir de 2003, se notificaron las reacciones adversas de la donación mediante un formulario diseñado para ese fin, se analizaron sus causas, se tomaron las medidas preventivas y correctivas pertinentes. Se efectuaron acciones para prevenir estas y mejorar la calidad de la colecta como capacitación y consejería a los donantes. Se organizó un sistema de alerta rápida para detectar y minimizar los riesgos relacionados con la donación y la calidad de la colecta. Resultados: se disminuyó la tasa de reacciones del donante de 10,1 por mil donaciones en 2002 a 1,4 por mil donaciones en 2011. Se eliminaron las reacciones graves y se minimizaron las moderadas. La reacción más frecuente fue la vasovagal leve. Conclusiones: la hemovigilancia es una herramienta eficaz para incrementar la seguridad de los donantes y mejorar la calidad de la colecta de sangre y puede implementarse con escasos recursos
Introduction: from January 2003 to December 2011 a program of hemovigilance was developed to increase the safety of transfusion in the province of Matanzas. Objective: to analyze the effects of this program on the adverse reactions of blood donors. Methods: adverse reactions to blood donation were identified in 2002 prior to the introduction of the program. The donation service was improved with the revision of procedures and standard practice; epidemiological and geographic data was included in the donor's selection process. From 2003 on, the adverse reactions to donations were notified using a form specially designed; causes were analyzed and prevention and corrective actions were taken. Other proceedings were applied to prevent negative reactions at donation and to improve the quality of blood collection, such as training and advice to donors. A quick alert system was set up to detect and to correct the risks related to donation and the quality of the collection. Results: there was a decrease on the donor's reaction rate from 10, 1 out of 1 000 donations in 2002 to 1,4 out of 1000 in 2011. Severe adverse reactions were eliminated and moderate reactions were minimized. The most frequent was the vasovagal reaction. Conclusions: hemovigilance is an effective tool to increase donors' safety and to improve the quality of blood collection and it can be implemented with scarce resources